Trump en la cacharrería

Iniciado por Dan, Enero 10, 2017, 11:00:23 PM

Tema anterior - Siguiente tema

PP2000

#930
Japón y China han lanzado un nuevo mecanismo de contacto para evitar un choque accidental entre buques de guerra o aviones de combate en la última señal de la madurez en la visibilidad de las profundas relaciones entre los dos "feroces" rivales del este de Asia. El nuevo mecanismo tomó 10 años de negociaciones y entró en vigencia 30 días después de la visita del primer ministro chino Li Keqiang a Japón. Su creación muestra cómo China y Japón esperan manejar su disputa territorial sobre las islas Senkaku o Diaoyu, así como reforzar las relaciones directas necesarias por la disruptiva e inestable diplomacia traída por el presidente estadounidense Donald Trump a Asia.

...que Trump favoreciendo (con el soporte tech & finnc de la Rusia con capital en Vladivostok) una NK soviet-light integrada socio-económicamente con SK en plan Taiwan+HK con RPCh en los 90's, les ha dejado escocida la ortonormal cosa mala...

Glatts



1. Donald Trump, presidente de Estados Unidos 2. John Bolton, asesor de Seguridad Nacional de Estados Unidos (la persona entre Bolton y Abe, de momento, no ha sido identificada) 3. Shinzo Abe, primer ministro de Japón 4. Yasutoshi Nishimura, secretario adjunto del gabinete de Japón 5. Angela Merkel, canciller de Alemania 6. Emmanuel Macron, presidente de Francia 7. Theresa May, primera ministra de Reino Unido 8. Larry Kudlow, director del Consejo Económico Nacional de Estados Unidos.

javi

Running is life. Anything before or after is just waiting

PP2000

Cita de: javi en Junio 10, 2018, 04:12:46 PM
Quién cuenta el chiste?

Merkel cuenta el de hoy no le mearás la boca a los ucranos... que el año que viene y mirate mientras lo de vender audi, mercedes y bmw aun más caros en san diego...


Lacenaire

#935
¿Y lo de separar a los críos de sus familias metiéndolos en celdas como los nazis y cuando estos berrean a pulmón quemado porque quieren a sus padres pillen a guardias haciendo coñas sobre que tienen orquesta opina la Banda Trumpera del Río o aquí ya no?

PP2000

El nivel de ausencia de empatía del WASP, sea redneck o sea de los que hacen vela en los grandes lagos solo es superado por japos y australianos, que, viviendo como viven con control de fronteras gratis (ellos si tiropedean no como los maricones macarronis), y llevan así desde lis pioneros celebran que el indio les salve de la hambruna para, subsiguientemente, matarlos de hambre cercados en tierras baldías que K regaría con la sangre de comunistas a ver que pasa... quicir, es del hilo USA es mierda, no es un rollo Trump en exclusiva.

k98k

Cita de: Gipsy King en Junio 19, 2018, 12:49:01 PM
¿Y lo de separar a los críos de sus familias metiéndolos en celdas como los nazis y cuando estos berrean a pulmón quemdado porque quieren a sus padres pillen a guardias haciendo coñas sobre que tienen orquesta opina la Banda Trumpera del Río o aquí ya no?

¿Como ese que saca las fotos de los niños entrullados en 2014 y la vende como que es ahora?

Lacenaire

Cita de: PP2000 en Junio 19, 2018, 01:00:05 PM
El nivel de ausencia de empatía del WASP, sea redneck o sea de los que hacen vela en los grandes lagos solo es superado por japos y australianos, que, viviendo como viven con control de fronteras gratis (ellos si tiropedean no como los maricones macarronis), y llevan así desde lis pioneros celebran que el indio les salve de la hambruna para, subsiguientemente, matarlos de hambre cercados en tierras baldías que K regaría con la sangre de comunistas a ver que pasa... quicir, es del hilo USA es mierda, no es un rollo Trump en exclusiva.

Los australos lo que tienen es una especie de campo de retención modelo caja_negra subcontratado a me parece que los papuaguineanos, donde pasarán las cosas que pasen.

k98k


Lacenaire

Cita de: k98k en Junio 19, 2018, 01:07:07 PM
Cita de: Gipsy King en Junio 19, 2018, 12:49:01 PM
¿Y lo de separar a los críos de sus familias metiéndolos en celdas como los nazis y cuando estos berrean a pulmón quemdado porque quieren a sus padres pillen a guardias haciendo coñas sobre que tienen orquesta opina la Banda Trumpera del Río o aquí ya no?

¿Como ese que saca las fotos de los niños entrullados en 2014 y la vende como que es ahora?

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/18/17475292/family-separation-border-immigration-policy-trump

Aquí tienes hasta vídeos con colorines.

Lacenaire

Dice el infracoágulo de colesterol con tupé que EEUU "no puede convertirse en un campo de refugiados". Este no ha visitado el Skid Row.


PP2000

Cita de: Gipsy King en Junio 19, 2018, 01:19:45 PM
Dice el infracoágulo de colesterol con tupé que EEUU "no puede convertirse en un campo de refugiados". Este no ha visitado el Skid Row.

Debe haber como 40 millones de centroamericanos y mexicanos de donde no lo distinguirías ni con el CSI de Guatemala que (conciencienzudamente informados por agentes turista de las ONGs centroeuropea que le wstán devolviendo a USA lo que nos ha sacudido con somalies, eritreos, sudaneses y excepcionalmente, algún libio y sirio jodido con su guerra, como el mexica con su narcopollo) deseando mejorar su vida (exponencialmente) de jornalero en cualquier lugar de USA o Canadá... gestionar eso no lo quieras para tí.

PP2000

#944
Cita de: PP2000 en Junio 18, 2018, 09:47:04 PM
http://www.twitter.com/BuzzFeedNews/status/1008749579544748032

Esta movida me pone porque son las prisas, de un tipo medio sensato, después de Clinton, Bush Jr y Obama pasando de orbitar cosas que molan... ¡porque no era un buen negocio gastar pasta en la NASA, como quien dice, en una empresa pública!, y ahora le ven los dientes a lobo... dientes ruskis, pues los chinos no van a tener cojones de independizarse de fusilar diseños ruskis y usar componentes ruskis no clonables durante, lo menos, treinta años...

How does Trump's Space Force compare to Russia and China's space

By Euan McKirdy CNN -- US President Donald Trump's mooted Space Force, which he suggested will be a "separate but equal" branch of the military, is vital to maintaining a tactical advantage over geopolitical adversaries, according to analysts and members of the US military.

Speaking at a space policy event at the White House Monday, Trump insisted that "we must have American dominance in space," and announced he is "directing the Department of Defense and Pentagon to immediately begin the process necessary to establish the Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces."

"We are going to have the Air Force and we are going to have the Space Force," he said. "Separate but equal, it is going to be something so important."

Space, he said, is "going to be important monetarily and militarily. We don't want China and Russia and other countries leading us. We've always led -- we've gone way far afield for decades now."

The creation of a militarized space force is by no means a new concept. In the US, the development of an advanced space program has been a critical element of national security since the Eisenhower administration.

This process was accelerated during the Cold War, following the rapid expansion of the Soviet Union's own satellite and space programs.

Today, the United States is among a number of countries to maintain an advanced space program, utilizing technologies such as navigation satellites for military purposes.

Speaking to CNN, Military Analyst US Lt. Col. Rick Francona (ret.) said that most US military leaders understand that the United States needs to be the dominant force in space in order to maintain its competitive edge.

"I hate the term 'the final frontier' but (space) is the ultimate high ground. Space doesn't dominate one small geographic area -- it dominates continents, oceans," said Francona. "Most military thinkers know this is the battle space of the future."

In 1967, the US joined the Soviet Union in signing the Outer Space Treaty, an international set of agreements meant to prevent weapons of mass destruction from being placed in space.

What shape Trump's Space Force will eventually take currently remains unclear, though any serious attempts to place weaponized systems into space will likely prove prove contentious.

"The US military relies heavily on space based operations, including communications, command and control, intelligence, surveillance, and all facets of operations," said Francona.

"It's essential (for US interests) that the US military has not only access to, but dominance of space."

Following remarks made in May by Trump, US Rep. Mike Rogers, an Alabama Republican congressman who has long advocated for the inclusion of a separate branch of the military to defend American interests and defenses in space, told CNN that "Russia and China are surpassing us in space capabilities and we need to dedicate a separate force solely with a space mission.

"The future of war will be fought in space, and we must stay diligent and ahead of other countries for our own national security."

There is some cause for urgency. Putin has boasted of Russian development of a hypersonic glide vehicle that can be launched into space, navigate on its own into Earth's atmosphere and avoid radar and antimissile defenses.

Similarly, while Chinese officials have always stressed the country's "peaceful motives" behind its space exploration and utilization China has developed and tested anti-satellite and antiballistic missile weapons, that analysts say could disrupt and destroy most US communication satellites.

A 2015 report prepared by the US Department of Defense suggested China was developing co-orbital anti-satellite systems to target US space assets.

"These systems consist of a satellite armed with a weapon such as an explosive charge, fragmentation device, kinetic energy weapon, laser, radio frequency weapon, jammer, or robotic arm," read the report.

Responding to a question from CNN regarding Trump's announcement Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang said that "Outer space is an asset shared by all mankind. China always advocates the peaceful use of outer space, and opposes the weaponization of outer space and space arms races."

Asked whether the formation of the the US Space Force could spark a renewed space race, Geng said that China was "even more opposed to treating outer space as a battleground. We hope all sides will make a joint effort to earnestly preserve lasting peace and calm in outer space."

Technological developments

At present, space weaponry broadly falls into three categories.

"Weapons from the ground that attack spaceborne assets, (such as) lasers to blind and interfere with satellites' guidance; weapons in space that attack other assets in space; and space borne weapons attacking targets on earth," said Francona.

According to Francona, there are only three powers capable of operating a space-based military presence: Russia, China and the US.

"Both Russia and China have acknowledged they are developing -- or have developed -- counter-space capabilities," US Navy Adm. Cecil D. Haney said in 2015.

"Both countries have advanced directed energy capabilities that could be used to track or blind satellites, disrupting key operations, and both have demonstrated the ability to perform complex maneuvers in space."

While the US was the first country to develop anti-satellite technology, back in the Kennedy era, much of this technology has fallen by the wayside, given an assumed dominance of space, said Brian Weeden, Technical Adviser for the Secure World Foundation, which promotes cooperative solutions for space sustainability and the peaceful uses of outer space.

Similarly, Russia's programs atrophied at the end of the cold war but there's now "evidence that they're reconstituting them, and China is building its space capabilities, both offensive and defensive (from) reconnaissance satellites, communication satellites (and) evidence that it's building ground launched anti-satellite missiles," said Weeden.

Currently the US' space operations are largely in a defensive posture, said Weeden, but with Chinese and Russian developments in the field some advocates of a stronger military presence, like US Rep. Mike Rogers, have argued that this may need to change.

Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, has also said the US needs to embrace a new policy and make it clear that if command and control or warning satellites are targeted, the US "would consider that to be a hostile act" and respond.

"It's probably time as a country that we start to talk about this," said Wilson.