tema oficial de tecnologí­a militar

Iniciado por ghostdog, Marzo 01, 2006, 09:21:33 PM

Tema anterior - Siguiente tema

PP2000

Bueno, poco a poco la UE (la EDA) va haciendo sus cosas con gaseosa (y creo que me voy a hinchar a viajar con uno de lo mío, precisamente)... lo que ya falta por ver es si no me he jubilado para cuando se pongan en ese plan de dinero gastado a cascaporro en un conceptual (que se pondrán)

k98k

Cita de: PP2000 en Marzo 25, 2019, 10:46:18 AM
Bueno, poco a poco la UE (la EDA) va haciendo sus cosas con gaseosa (y creo que me voy a hinchar a viajar con uno de lo mío, precisamente)... lo que ya falta por ver es si no me he jubilado para cuando se pongan en ese plan de dinero gastado a cascaporro en un conceptual (que se pondrán)

Tarde o temprano, aunque con los sobrecostes del S-80 nos habiamos hecho con un LHA y 12 F-35B

PP2000

No son sobrecostes, es contabilidad creativa, un bicho de 3000 t con la operatividad que va a ofrecer y, bueno, lo que otros son capaces de ofrecer por idéntico precio (U-216 noruego) vale mil minolles la pieza... como se ha conseguido pagar eso compitiendo con bichos subvencionados por Berlín más cojos de capacidad oceánica que una rhib, pues, bueno, esto es España.

k98k

Cita de: PP2000 en Marzo 25, 2019, 04:17:36 PM
No son sobrecostes, es contabilidad creativa, un bicho de 3000 t con la operatividad que va a ofrecer y, bueno, lo que otros son capaces de ofrecer por idéntico precio (U-216 noruego) vale mil minolles la pieza... como se ha conseguido pagar eso compitiendo con bichos subvencionados por Berlín más cojos de capacidad oceánica que una rhib, pues, bueno, esto es España.

Las baterías y el sistema de combate estaban muy bien en 2008, ahora....

PP2000

Toda obsolescencia programada puede verse como una oportunidad (al menos internamente nos estamos moviendo mucho, y, a mejor, nacionalizando todo lo que se pueda en esos refrescos de mitad de ciclo de vida tan obvios).

k98k

Cita de: PP2000 en Marzo 25, 2019, 06:13:02 PM
Toda obsolescencia programada puede verse como una oportunidad (al menos internamente nos estamos moviendo mucho, y, a mejor, nacionalizando todo lo que se pueda en esos refrescos de mitad de ciclo de vida tan obvios).

El problema de hacerle la MLU antes de botarlo es que te quedan 15 años viables

PP2000

Cita de: k98k en Marzo 25, 2019, 10:01:00 PM
Cita de: PP2000 en Marzo 25, 2019, 06:13:02 PM
Toda obsolescencia programada puede verse como una oportunidad (al menos internamente nos estamos moviendo mucho, y, a mejor, nacionalizando todo lo que se pueda en esos refrescos de mitad de ciclo de vida tan obvios).

El problema de hacerle la MLU antes de botarlo es que te quedan 15 años viables

A las válvulas de casco desde luego no, porque, putos bretxianos, aun estaban rediseñando antesdeayer... pero bueno, lo que quieras, mira el U2 que derribaron en la guerra de cuba como le meten una revisión del radar de barrido y, hala, a volar otros cuarenta años más para mayor gloria de la USAF

PP2000

La US Navy de la tricolor con el toro de Osborne ha otorgado al gigante aeroespacial Boeing dos contratos para la actualización y el soporte del avión T/AV-8B Harrier II, por 71,3 millones de dólares de allí para proporcionar ingeniería y soporte logístico durante la Fase de soporte de postproducción del avión. Asimismo, recibió un contrato de USD 16 millones para servicios de ingeniería, incluidas las actualizaciones de los conjuntos de configuración del sistema, la integración de la aviónica y las armas y la mitigación de la obsolescencia de la aviónica. El trabajo se realizará en St. Louis, Missouri, y se espera que se complete en marzo de 2024 <- traducción: la docena de F-35 que la AE supone que un día le tocarán en un rifa se la acaba de joder el hermano mayor porque, snif, piensan seguir confiando en el viejo bicho panzudo hasta el 2040 o así... vaya, así no hay manera (eso dicen los turcos, que tienen dos JCI i no van a ver un F-35 ni en pintura... y esos si tienen un plan, son turcos, bueno o malo, tienen un plan... seguiremos atento su evolución, ...porque parecerse a la marina de UK que se parezca su puta madre -se oye pensar a los marines yanquis-).


el block III es otro, pero no encuentro fotico... igual es que lo tienen que diseñar y tal


PP2000

Yo ahí veo dos cargadores para dos calibres distintos, digamos un 0.303 y un 0.5... dime que estoy flipando

PP2000

Cita de: PP2000 en Abril 05, 2019, 09:46:08 AM
Yo ahí veo dos cargadores para dos calibres distintos, digamos un 0.303 y un 0.5... dime que estoy flipando
estás flipando

PP2000

Cita de: k98k en Febrero 19, 2019, 01:12:59 PM
¿Que? ¿Ya habéis empezado con el S90?

La orden ha sido rubricada por el subdirector general de Adquisiciones de Armamento y Material (DGAM), Coronel Alfonso Torán; por el director de Operaciones y Negocios de Navantia, Gonzalo Mateo-Guerrero y por la directora Comercial y de Desarrollo de Negocio de Navantia, Sofía Honrubia. Además, asistieron a la firma, celebrada en la sede del Ministerio, el secretario de Estado de Defensa, Angel Olivares; el director General de la DGAM, Almirante Santiago Ramón González y la presidenta de Navantia, Susana de Sarriá.

PP2000

#928
Goods news from our shipyards: EU manufacturers of military vessels and submarines are doing well, especially on international markets where exports are booming. No reason though for the industry to rest on its laurels as it urgently needs to invest in research & technology (R&T) if it wants to stay at the top, as a recent study commissioned by the European Defence Agency (EDA) shows.

This article appeared in the EDA's European Defence Matters

Despite difficult conditions on a growingly turbulent global naval market – mainly caused by rising exports from Chinese, Russian and South Korean shipyards - Europe's naval industry has managed to maintain its position as a highly competitive global player if not a world leader, notably thanks to its technological edge and strong exports, the EDA-commissioned "Study on Industrial and Technological Competences in the Naval Sector" concludes.

The study, which was carried out by a consortium in 2015 and early 2016 (see box below), confirms that European naval industries are very strong in their respective domestic European markets - but also in international markets such as the Middle East, Africa, Asia and Latin America which all devote growing budgets to defence and often have no meaningful indigenous naval industry. Also due to decreasing defence budgets in Europe (at least over the past decade, whereas the trend has now started to reverse), export markets nowadays account for 42% of the European naval order book value.

Healthy successful industrial base, but...

Another positive characteristic of the European naval industry, according to the study, is its ability to design, integrate and produce the whole range of naval ships and almost the totality of its core systems and components. "Considering the complexity and sophistication of the products designed and built by these companies, they can be regarded as 'system integrators', dismissing once forever the old image of shipbuilders as mere assemblers of steel blocks", it says.
The European naval industry's supply chain is also considered both diverse and complete with no area in which a monopoly exists. Most importantly (with regard to Europe's strategic autonomy in defence) there are European alternative suppliers and replacement options in place for all systems/components currently procured from outside Europe.

Business diversification is another trump card played by the European naval industry. The majority of the naval players are also successful players in the high-end segments of merchant shipbuilding (e.g. cruise ships and mega-yachts) and in the related maritime activities (e.g. offshore and marine renewable energies). "This diversification strategy has created a favourable cross-fertilization between civil and military technologies (dual-use technologies), both at the Prime Contractors and at the Supply-Chain levels, leading to cost-effective designs and solutions", the study says.

The study's overall conclusion could hardly be more encouraging: "The European Naval Industrial Base today is made up of healthy, capable, diversified and successful export-oriented companies".

... more R&T investments needed

However, all forecasts in the study are not entirely rosy. The study also warns that some threats stemming from non-European competitors are on the horizon such as fierce price competition from non-EU countries, especially China, South Korea and Russia. Countries which very actively support their naval industries "as an act both of foreign and industrial policy".

According to the study, the best way to counter this threat is by maintaining Europe's technological lead at the Prime/System Integrators level as well as across the full supply chain "through increased, more supported, more coordinated and more focused investments in Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) at national and European level". In order to increase intra-EU cooperation in the naval defence and security domain, a dedicated area for naval related research should be secured within the next multi-annual Framework for Research, Development and Innovation starting in 2021, the study recommends: "This is essential to the long-term sustainability of the European naval industry".

The European Commission's upcoming Preparatory Action (PA) on defence-related research and the Defence Action Plan (scheduled for later this year) could also play a key role as political frameworks to increase the resources devoted to defence research activities, including in the naval domain, the study concludes. "Here, a distinct role of overall coordinator is foreseen and advocated for the EDA", it says. The study also pleads for a regular exchange of ideas between the EDA and the major players in the naval shipbuilding sector in order to better coordinate and integrate the objectives of the future R&T programmes in this field.

Finally, the study has also led to a list of technologies considered of "primary importance" both to maintain the European competitiveness and technological lead and to ensure the required level of operational superiority. In total 13 high priority topics and 4 new items were identified.

The high priority list includes surface technologies topics (virtual ships, simulation, maintenance, oceanography, environmental protection, supply & support), subsea technologies (hydrodynamics and UxV integration, modularity, UxV integration, vulnerability reduction, propulsor) as well as services and transversal technologies (uninhabited systems, propulsor & propellers).

The identified new R&T topics to be focussed on in the future are 3D printing, high capacity batteries, augmented reality and drones.

About the study:

With the adoption of the EU Maritime Security Strategy in 2014 which also encompasses defence-related aspects through its CSDP dimension, the maritime domain has gained renewed focus at EU level. The ability for European nations to implement such a strategy will depend on both the availability of required capabilities for both civilian missions and military operations, and the existence of a competent and competitive naval industrial base. Therefore, in 2015, the EDA commissioned this study – which was conducted by a consortium of Sea Europe (lead partner), Damen, DCNS, Fincantieri, Navantia and TKMS - to acquire a comprehensive picture of the European Naval Technological and Industrial base and its technological priorities: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/edidp-fnprt-2019;freeTextSearchKeyword=EDIDP;typeCodes=0,1;statusCodes=31094501,31094502;programCode=null;programDivisionCode=null;focusAreaCode=null;crossCuttingPriorityCode=null;callCode=Default;sortQuery=openingDate;orderBy=asc;onlyTenders=false;topicListKey=topicSearchTablePageState

ahora curro ahí (a ratos)